H-1B Lottery Lawsuit

Lawsuit Against H-1B Lottery: Case Seeks Information on the Lottery Process

H1b 2016

The American Immigration Council has filed a lawsuit against USCIS, demanding transparency in the lottery process that affects the lives of hundreds of thousands of individuals and thousands of companies. With a statutory cap of 65,000 visas in the regular cap and 20,000 visas in the US Master’s cap, the over 230,000 applications that are submitted in the first week of April are subject to a lottery. However, there is no information on how that lottery works. Applications are submitted in early April and then receipt notices and lottery rejections trickle in over the next months.

In some years, the cap is not reached and there is no need for a lottery. However, for the past few years, the number of applications has been over 200,000 and the cap is reached in the first week of April. As this has become consistent, the need for lottery transparency has become urgent for the American Immigration Council. All that is known about the process is that it is random and computer generated. The lawsuit seeks to elicit more information from USCIS in how this process is conducted.

Green Card Lawsuit Dismissed

Green Card Lawsuit Dismissed

EB-5 pilot program

A federal judge in Seattle has dismissed the Visa Bulletin lawsuit that ensued from the Department of State rescission of filing dates. Back in September 2015, it seemed that the Department of State had made enormous progress in modernizing the Visa Bulletin system, so that individuals (especially in the EB-2 and EB-3 categories and some FB categories) were finally able to file for their Green Cards after years of waiting. Their anticipation lasted about two weeks when the Department suddenly rescinded its October Visa bulletin posting and superseded it with a new October Visa Bulletin.

A class-action lawsuit was filed seeking a temporary injunction, but that was rejected. This most recent rejection occurred because the judge found that the original Visa Bulletin did not confer any rights upon the immigrants. Although the announcement caused a reliance for intending applicants by undergoing medical exams and paying expenses for green card applications, that was not enough. The two week blip on the radar was an inconvenience, but nothing that could create relief for the class. June’s Visa Bulletin contains severe retrogression in many employment and family categories.

Refugees Go to Tim Horton’s

Welcome to Canada: Refugees Go to Tim Horton’s

The issue of Syrian refugees has caused legislators and voters in the United States to push the boundaries of immigration law in preventing their resettlement. States have written legislation in selective prevention of resettlement, and they have sued the federal government over the issue.

In Canada, this was the scene for Syrian refugees at a Tim Horton’s, Canada’s iconic doughnut and coffee shop.

Click here for CBC video.

Employment Authorization Lawsuit

Class Action for Late Employment Authorizations

The Northwest Immigrants Rights Project and The Advocates for Human Rights, using 3 immigrants as plaintiffs, have filed a class action lawsuit against USCIS. The lawsuit was filed in May 2015 and the organizations filing the lawsuit are seeking immigrants they can include in the lawsuit. The claim in the class action suit is that USCIS is taking longer than 90 days to adjudicate Employment Authorization Cards. Federal regulations dictate that USCIS must decide whether an applicant receives a card within 90 days of receiving the application.  The lawsuit charges USCIS with not adhering to the mandatory 90 days.

Employment Authorization Cards are important for many reasons, chief of which is granting someone the legal authority to work. A person can apply for the card for a variety of reasons. Someone applying for an adjustment of status may want the card while the application is pending. An asylum applicant waiting 2.5 years for the interview can obtain the document and work. A VAWA applicant, qualified H-4 dependent, E-2 dependent, DACA recipient, and host of other categories of foreign nationals in the United States can benefit from the Employment Authorization Card. Not having possession of a valid card can have dire consequences for applicants, who need the card for legal work authorization.

The American Immigration Council has a call out for immigrants who believe they have been affected by late adjudications.

With this in mind, it is crucial to file for your employment authorization card as timely as possible. Most applications require a $380 filing fee, so it is important to file on time, meet the requirements, and plan financially.

Refugees in Texas

Refugees Arrive in Texas

Syrian refugees arrived in Texas last night, after the state relented on its legal right to prevent refugee resettlement in the state.

The plight of the Syrian refugees has caused many Western countries to think about their refugee resettlement programs. Countries have argued internally about how many refugees they should accept. Refugees have bounced around the European Union, undergoing the long vetting process before they can be accepted. The United States has had similar discussions, arguing how many Syrian refugees to accept and even whether we should accept any.

Texas filed a lawsuit last week against the federal government and the International Rescue Committee. The governor wants to block the resettlement of a Syrian refugee family in its state. Thirty-one governors have voiced their opposition to Syrian refugees settling in their states. Texas is the first state to take legal action in manifesting its opposition. The federal government has emphasized that governors lack the authority to decide whether or not refugees can settle in their states. Immigration is in the purview of the federal government. The lawsuit contends through the Refugee Act of 1980 and security concerns that the federal government and IRC need to consult with the states. For its part, the IRC has stated it has worked with Texas for 40 years to ensure the smooth resettlement of refugees into the state.

The lawsuit remains pending. On December 4, the state withdrew its request for an order immediately preventing the refugees from entering the state.