Retaining College Graduates

The Best and Worst Cities at Retaining College Graduates

 

This is a statistically-based article that methodically and neatly describes the large metros in the United States and their ability to retain college graduates. The flight of college graduates is a concern for many metropolitan cities. A high retention rate of college graduates can be viewed as a reliable indicator of economic viability.

The article misses a critical point: immigration.

At US colleges and universities, large and small, the number of foreign students is high. Foreign students from all over the world, flock to American universities for education and the opportunities that education opens. Well over a million F-1 visa students are in the United States. However, their post-graduate options are limited. Someone who attends undergraduate and graduate school in the same city may have embedded himself into the community. That graduate, however, may not have the ability to stay in the United States. Only 85,000 cap subject H-1B visas are available. The O-1 visa bears a high standard for eligibility. J visa ability is limited. L visas have foreign restrictions that would make them unviable for US college graduates. Not every country allows for E visas (notoriously India) and even then, that is an extraordinary expense and may not comport with what the graduate is pursuing. Immigration visas are generally shut off for recent graduates.

There are millions of foreign graduates and not a commensurate number of visas or options to retain their talents and skills. Graduate retention rates would be higher for many cities if foreign national recent graduates had the ability to stay in the United States and work for employers that want to hire them. For example, 233,000 H-1B cap-subject visas were filed last year for the 85,000 visa spots.

The article did not consider this angle as a reason to why some retention rates are more depressed, but this is certainly a factor. Cities are losing the opportunity to retain their college graduates and the lack of nonimmigrant visa options is a major reason why.

India Files Complaint Over H-1B Visa

India Files Complaint Against USA:

Complaint Over Special Fees and H-1B Cap

H1b 2016

India is alleging the United States is engaged in unfair trade practices in the World Trade Organization. The suit is on two bases: the H-1B cap of 65,000 and 20,000 and the enhanced fees that Congress recently slapped on large companies with over 50% of their employees on H-1B or L-1 visas. The case is at the World Trade Organization because India is alleging that the United States has violated trade rules with recently implemented special fees and with the 65,000 cap. The World Trade Organization is the forum where unfair trade restrictions are decided as unfair or fair.

The Cap

The H-1B visa’s lifespan has been governed by a cap, which has historically been larger but has settled in at 65,000 for over a decade. A supplementary 20,000 visas were added for US Master’s graduates. The cap is not exactly 65,000. It is even less, when considering special agreements that the US has with Chile and Singapore. The trade agreement stipulates that 1,400 H-1B visas are allocated for Chilean nationals and 5,4000 H-1B visas belong to nationals of Singapore. For beneficiary nationals of other countries, that means the cap is actually 58,200. Additionally, that is only the cap. A cap is a ceiling not a floor. The US is not required to grant 65,000 cap-subject H-1B visas. It can grant fewer than that.

The US has two arguments against the cap and special allocation of visas for Chile and Singapore. The first is the recent creation of the 20,000 visas for US Master’s graduates. The second is cap-exempt visas, which are reserved for academic, research, and sometimes medical purposes.

Enhanced Visa Fees

In December 2015, an Omnibus Bill was passed that contained some financially harsh provisions against large firms that employ H-1B and L-1 visa holders. While much of the focus in the bill’s germination stage focused on Syrian refugees and the Visa Waiver Program, provisions against these large firms snuck in and have been instituted. For firms that have at least 50 employees, of whom 50% are in H-1B or L-1 status, there is an additional $4,000 fee for every H-1B and $4,500 L-1 initial and extension application. The previous fee of $2,000 was sui generis.

H-1B applications can be expensive for employers. A base filing fee of $325 is required for every application. Depending on the circumstances of the application, a Fraud Prevention and Detection fee of $500 is applied. An ACWIA fee of $750 or $1,500 may be required. H-1B extension and change of status applications are taking such an excruciatingly long time to adjudicate that premium processing is being constructively required. Premium processing requires $1,225. These fees accumulate, especially for multiple workers, escalating fees for every application.

The complaint at the World Trade Organization alleges that this enhanced visa fee is an unfair trade restriction. It is expected that the World Trade Organization will take a year to make a decision at least.

H-1B Extension Delays

H-1B Extension Delays in Processing Times

H1b 2016

A recent problem in USCIS adjudications is lengthy processing times for H-1B extension applications. These are applications filed without premium processing. The delays are problematic: they force employers to fork over the $1,225.00 for premium processing, and they can cause significant hardships for affected employees. USCIS Service Center Operations has acknowledged that the lengthy processing times are a problem and USCIS is working on reducing those times.

American Immigration Lawyers Association is working with USCIS to reduce the processing time. The main issues are employees in danger of losing employment authorization or were otherwise forced to request an upgrade to premium processing as a result of the backlog; and (2) clients with a pending H-1B extension petition, where the H-1B beneficiary is within one month of the expiration of the automatic 240-day employment authorization extension.

It is important to consult with the attorney filing your H-1B application whether premium processing is necessary. Both service centers are close to 6 months in processing time. That means an application submitted today would not be adjudicated until the end of July or beginning of August. Premium processing forces a decision within 15 days.

New Rules for EB-1 Immigrants and H-1B1, E-3, and CW-1 Nonimmigrants

The Department of Homeland Security has published new rules affecting the following groups: EB-1 outstanding professor and research immigrants; H-1B1; E-3, and CW-1 nonimmigrants. The final published rule takes effect February 16, 2016.

H-1B1 and principal E-3 nonimmigrants are authorized for employment incident to their status with a specific employer. That means nonimmigrants in those classes can work for their sponsoring employer without having to obtain an employment card separately.

H-1B1 and principal E-3 nonimmigrants who have expired status while their employer’s timely filed extension of stay request is pending can continue their employment with that employer for 240 days.

DHS is allowing for continued employment authorization for CW-1 nonimmigrants with expired status while their employer’s timely extension request remains pending.

EB-1 outstanding professions and researchers can provide the same types of evidence as the other EB-1 categories.

DHS is trumpeting these rules as enhanced opportunities for employers and highly skilled workers.

USCIS Processing Times

USCIS Processing Times Released

EB-5 pilot program

USCIS has released its most recent processing times for all of the kinds of cases it adjudicates. The data are broken down by the specific Service Center. For example, E-2 visa applications are adjudicated by the California Service Center. The processing time listed is two months. Both the Vermont and California Service Centers adjudicate O and P visa petitions. The California Service Center is adjudicating these petitions in two weeks, which is their stated goal. Vermont Service Center is taking over two months. Of note are that the Vermont Service Center is working on U Visa applications filed in May of 2014. It seems that most Employment Authorization applications are on track to be adjudicated within the regulatory mandated 90 days.

Premium Processing is available for the following kinds of cases. Premium processing requires a $1,225 fee. In exchange, the Service Center will render a decision within 15 days and communicate by email for faster correspondence.